Untitled Document

Coaches Internet Cafe
Decrease font size
Increase font size
 new topic  join  help  faq  home
latest topics : statistics
FORUMS arrow 2009-2012 FIG CODE O... arrow JO Exception
Topic Title: JO Exception
Topic Summary: Should there be developmental suggestions?
Created On: 03/03/2008 09:18 PM
 Linear : Threading : Single : Branch
Topic Tools Topic Tools
View topic in raw text format. Print this topic.
03/03/2008 09:18 PM
User is offline View Users Profile Print this message

Author Icon
Dartnut88

Posts: 24
Joined: 11/16/2007

I was brainstorming recently as to how to make the 5 element groups more achievable or at least reached for by first year level 9's instead of just doing cookie cutter routines that score 11.5 and occasionally a 12. Rings was my recent problem and I would like to propose that a giant "through" handstand position (B value) be considered for the giant swing element group. By doing this I believe that we would be guiding our younger athletes in the right direction from a routine standpoint at an earlier age. I believe that there would be more athletes attempting the skill if there was no handstand requirement. The way that it could be judged would be by arm bend angle such as the regular giant just with no hold required. What do you guys think? Dave
Reply : Quote : Top : Bottom
FORUMS : 2009-2012 FIG CODE O... : JO Exception

Topic Tools Topic Tools
Statistics
83 users are registered to the Coaches Internet Cafe forum.
There are currently 0 users logged in.
The most users ever online was 1300 on 09/06/2010 at 10:29 PM.
There are currently 7 guests browsing this forum, which makes a total of 7 users using this forum.

FuseTalk Basic Edition - © 1999-2010 FuseTalk Inc. All rights reserved.